If you use bullshit arguments about equating the destruction of racists monuments to the destruction of history, you are de facto sympathizing with racists.

Presenting arguments equating destruction of monuments to destruction of history makes one a racist.

No it doesn't. Your assertion isn't more valid now than the first dozen times you tried it. This is classical poison the well fallacy.

We explained to you, at length, why this is flawed thinking. I personally offered examples of how to argue better. I also showed how counter productive your approach to reaching your stated goals.

After all of that you are still doing the same thing hoping it turns out better. I could only assume this is so because you are yearning for mocking. I am glad to oblige.

[Linked Image]