Originally Posted By: sini
Originally Posted By: Derid
Originally Posted By: sini
Why would insurance make this condition of coverage then?


Cause it is at least some sort of indication that someone with authorization to enter a premises (and a key) did not just pawn it off. Insurance typically only wants to cover random criminal behavior, not angry girlfriends.



Incorrect. They make it a condition of coverage because it demonstrates minimal acceptable level of preventative actions/deterrence. If you leave your door open you are a lot more likely to get burglarized.


Poor assumption is poor.

Not that this tangent has anything to do with the topic at hand. Unless you want to make the tired and incorrect " well banning X is better than nothing " act.

There have been people who have said "well if a law even prevented one death, it was worth it" forever. They werent right then, and still arent.

See Ice-T link posted previously for why. Its a strnage occurrence for me to be in 100% agreement with a gangsta rapper, but he is spot on.

For who could be free when every other man's humour might domineer over him? - John Locke (2nd Treatise, sect 57)