Originally Posted By: Derid

The takeaway was that even in a society where peons are disarmed, this guy would still have been armed.


First, you are trying to dog whistle here "society where peons are disarmed". Eyeroll.

Second, you have difficulty understanding that the shooter in no way was part of establishment (government men with guns). He was a private citizen with a concealed carry.

So any limitation to private gun ownership would have also limited perpetrator's access to guns.

Now question you really should be asking where I would have trouble answering is what kind of gun ownership limitation would have prevented this situation.

Instead you chose to dogwhistle and throw red meat. Eyeroll.

Still, of all kinds of innocent victims, the movie texter is the least innocent kind.


[Linked Image]