Originally Posted by Sini
Originally Posted by rhaikh
Originally Posted by Sini
However, US case law, as I understand it, states that Twitter does have freedom of association. Hence abominations like Citizens United.


The abomination here is the comparison. Organizations surely must be able to express speech on behalf of the interests of their members.


Can you enumerate other fictitious and imaginary entities that you believe should have right of speech? What about auto-dialers? What about bots? What about voices schizophrenic people hear?

You are very far from having me convinced that corporations should have freedom of speech. You can't hand-wave away Citizens United, it happened as a direct result of such views that you are also advocating. You need to address this before we can move forward.



Do I?

I told you I'm against Citizens United because essentially I disagree that unlimited money should be spent on political campaigns.

Maybe you can start us off here and explain why we shouldn't have worker's unions.

[Linked Image]