Originally Posted by Sini
Unless you define it as "since the last elections", why is modern history relevant? Both parties


You answered your own question with those two words. These parties, their platforms, personas, etc exist wholly because of the developments of modern history.

Originally Posted by Sini
For example, immigration. Democrats absolutely love malign conservative as racists over this. However, as a critical thinker you must acknowledge that there are non-racist reasons to oppose it. Especially illegal economic immigration. Yet, such acknowledgment is completely absent from any Democratic narrative.


I'm not defending the Democrats, I'm making the case that their talking point here is relevant and worthy of affirmation and response rather than recoil. If I were, though, I'd offer that they don't really need TWO good points to meet the bar of reasonable objection.

[Linked Image]