With utmost respect, it seems like you don't understand how the current law works. You are simultaneously arguing two points, #2 and #3 I listed above. Please, one at a time, happy to debate #2 next. Please do your own research until you agree that the following statement is factual: Businesses may refuse service to customers, unless doing so can be considered an act of discrimination. There are lots of edge cases embedded in this topic, but without you having a clear understanding of how this line gets drawn, it doesn't seem like we can continue this conversation. The cake shop was found to be on the wrong side of that "unless."

The only other explanation I can imagine for your rhetoric is that you believe NO businesses should have ANY right to refuse service, but formally make that case if that's your intention.

[Linked Image]