Originally Posted by rhaikh
These companies are acting in accordance with the laws and their own interests. Those they have turned away have viable alternatives available to them.

Re: Market will provide alternatives argument. And this is exactly why silicon valley trying to kill Gab so hard?
Re: This is not against the law argument. The companies that dumped toxic waste into Cuyahoga river until it caught fire multiple times were also acting in accordance with the laws and their own commercial interests.

--

Have you paused to consider why enough people felt that disruption is warranted and voted for Trump? Whatever you think of Trump, some normal people voted for him, he couldn't have possibly got elected just on crazy vote alone. I propose that these normal people voted for Trump seeking relief from censorship. This often comes up as anti political correctness complaining, but the root of this issue isn't that this or that is deemed offensive, but that some topics are made taboo to discuss, and these topics are exponentially multiplying in number.

I read recently that Twitter banned some radfem for "Women Aren't Men" post. You have to be all kinds of woke to even begin to understand why this ban happened.

[Linked Image]