You haven’t addressed my direct question. I’ll address the rest of your noise afterwards. How is Cloudflare’s action discrimination and not protection of their interests through refusal of service?

If you disagree with that, then you have to describe why these services are held to a higher standard than a regular business who can 86 disruptive customers despite their protected classes. If sued, the courts make this judgement call to decide if the business acted responsibly or with discrimination. To disagree, you’re saying these companies should not have this right and should never be allowed to do this, so you should provide a basis for what a company can do to lose this right.

Last edited by rhaikh; 01/20/19 10:44 AM.
[Linked Image]