Originally Posted by rhaikh
The difference is that Harris did not do original research with Murray, he is simply giving him platform and choosing to ignore valid rational arguments against the work itself to promote his agenda.


The difference is not meaningful in this context.


Originally Posted by rhaikh
Originally Posted by Sini
Pick any one of the highlighted points and justify your positions. For now they are just dubious accusations.


Congratulations on actually reading what I wrote for once. I think this is big step for you.

I grant that my claims are unfounded in this forum, but I reserve that they are based on rational analysis. Please do your own research as I'm done contributing to your bad faith discussion.


This doesn't make any sense. The examples you have put forth thus far demonstrate a high level of provable fallacy in your presented lines of reasoning, yet you are asking everyone to accept the correctness of your analysis on faith.

For who could be free when every other man's humour might domineer over him? - John Locke (2nd Treatise, sect 57)