Originally Posted By: Mithus
ok let put aside all the law and etcs, I just want to undersand how you guy view this

in a hypothetical case do you agree if a parcel of your popuation cannot pay for a private health care, they should not receive medical treatment, and the government with their power and resources that they get with your hard work from taxes should not intervene to give this parcel of population health care.

Is that correct to your point of view, I mean to you agree that they should no receive medical treatment because they cannot pay for that?


Hey Mithus,

The American form of Government was not created nor designed to do this. No government in the world has ever successfully sustained long term care and responsibility for its people except the monarchies of the arab states that have oil money. However, even Kuwait has started to withhdraw from and rethink other things like free medical care and college for all citizens. In the economies of today, a government can not sustain what it is supposed to sustain while taking care of people who do not need taking care of or who should have provided for their own care. This is the responsibility of the people and not the government. At best, it could be said that some care giving is the responsibility of the state and still not the federal government. Period.

[Linked Image from nodiatis.com]