Originally Posted By: sinij
Originally Posted By: Derid
The accusations of misogyny just simply make no sense.


I know you wouldn't even acknowledge such fundamental libertarian issue like control over your own body when it applied to women, so it is not at all surprising that you would not see misogyny in Pauls actions.


Care to explain how this line of BS, that sprung from somewhere in your imagination is justified? I honestly wonder how someone can come to such delusional conclusions then treat them as fact.

For who could be free when every other man's humour might domineer over him? - John Locke (2nd Treatise, sect 57)