Originally Posted By: Derid
Originally Posted By: sinij
Somalia is not such off-base comparison. It demonstrate what happens when society disappears. You cannot create wealth in the vacuum, and society isn't just "is", social order has to be maintained so productive part of society can go on and create wealth.


Except in no place have you made a successful argument that your brand of socialism is required or instrumental in the maintenance of such order. In fact, as society has greatly flourished, all things considered in the past two centuries and the topics we are debating revolve around relatively new or upcoming introductions into our economic and political life - it is therefore demonstratively false that your "Somalia example" serves as anything but a Red Herring in the discussion.


You are misdirecting. Do you or do you not acknowledge that one of the roles of society is to enable wealth creation, and that no wealth could be created without society?

[Linked Image]