Originally Posted By: Vuldan


There is NOTHING in the Constitution granting this authority.


This is logical fallacy.

Let me help you understand with following hypothetical example - There is nothing in the Constitution allowing people to fly planes. This statement does not translates into "flying planes is unconstitutional".

Originally Posted By: Vuldan

Entitlement programs, regardless of source, are socialist instruments, and no government can sustain them.


Again, you are channeling Fox News. How about Sweden, Netherlands, Canada just to name few?


Quote:
Your point would be what? That because there is no exact language in the Constitution forbidding their creation that they are ok?


My point is that creation of any and all entitlement programs is perfectly constitutional and you cannot frame argument based on this.

[Linked Image]