its called libertarianism. i dont see how fiscal conservatism jives with your position on socialized medicine and class warfare that you advocate in your other posts, and your "bush third term" statement is likely a straw man you are using to bash the current candidates. Seeing how you have attacked the anti-romneys in turn, i highly doubt you would give anyone but the unelectable Ron Pail a second look.

Also the fact that you view yourself as mainstream is a comic statement of how far off balance YOU are. I view Romney as weak, and not a conservative. Im not voting for him. Compared to Nixon and Reagan, Romney is a moderate. Reagan and Nixon won 49 state landslides. Romney will be lucky to win the popular vote at all. So I view republicans as democrats-lite.

Meanwhile the democrats have almost radicalized themselves right out of office at the federal level. their historic losses in 2010 are completely due to their passing of obamacare, lack of budgets (three years as of today), and blatant disregard of their constituents. Now they are lining up to support commie/aocialist revolutions (and islamist) including the pathetic OWS protests. This will not play well in november.

The radicalization of the democrats, despite their control of the media and popular culture, is not reflective of the us electorate. The democrats are going to lose more seats this election and have only themselves to blame.

KGB Darkfall