The conclusions you have tried to draw from that data have already been soundly debunked. ( Your conclusions, not the data itself - contrary to the assertions you made elsewhere.)

Time for a new line of argument. Your refusal to process anything anyone says has been noted, and grows wearisome.

I did a little more digging on the graph - no wonder you draw such strong conclusions from it. I should have realized that the conclusions you were spouting werent your own, but rather talking points from an Obama book.

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB123681860305802821.html

No wonder you can quote data, but not interpret what it means in the real world. You let Obama do it for you.

Trying to make a MORAL case for taxation simply because some families have two incomes and/or live in high cost of living areas just wont ever fly.

For who could be free when every other man's humour might domineer over him? - John Locke (2nd Treatise, sect 57)