Yes, everything you say is a valid, except you failed to consider immediate consequences of your position and instead talking about some might-never-come ideal outcome and ideal way of things. You assumed that if get government out of enforcing Net Neutrality, then magically we are going to arrive into completely market-driven internet infrastructure free of any kind of uncompetitive distortions. It doesn't work that way.

In reality we will end up in a shithole where providers double-triple-dip charge everyone and build walled gardens. Net Neutrality is what keeps these other evils somewhat in check.

Net Neutrality has to exist because other evils you described exist. When/If they disappear then the need for NN will also disappear.

A lot of your views follow this scenario:

You have a crumbling dam protecting a city downstream. You end up advocating to dynamite the damn and justify your views based on the fact that eventually river will settle into its natural course and repairing the dam will no longer be necessary. Meanwhile it is obvious that your approach will also end up in a city getting washed away.

[Linked Image]