Not just 1 chairman, maybe a "security council" like in the highly ineffective U.N. :P

Yeah often small guilds will be a group of RL friends, so together they can actually fight pretty well. 5 guys aren't going to help us destroy 500, but they do contribute sligthly.

That's a good idea though, the protection category, and then the policy-making category.

Thing about the alliance though is I see it as more of a way to defend our community. I didn't see it as a way to make offensives.

You see, say KGB is at war with guild A, our allies B and C are at war with guilds D and E, respectively. If it goes on like that we'd technically be fighting the whole server. For offensive campaigns I would see it as more of a decision of who to war. We invade their territory and then split it up equally. That way our alliance is only fighting a few guilds at once.


BoS Archon
[Linked Image from miniprofile.xfire.com][Linked Image from sigimages.bf2tracker.com]