Originally Posted By: Kaotic
I only alleged that NIST did not do a thorough job in their report and that that sort of slip-shod work is typical of a government bureaucracy. That's it.


And we all agreed on that part, but please note topic did not die there.

Originally Posted By: sinij
After watching video I concluded: a) Government report was half-assed b) National response was botched due to understandably being unprepared for something like 9/11


Above is quote of my saying exactly this in that other thread.

So what did we not address? We did not address "controlled demolition" and "building 7" claims from the video.

Now please tell me how can you make "controlled demolition" claim and NOT make it some sort of a conspiracy? Buildings don't "controlled demolition" on their own. This is the point where one would cross from healthy skepticism into conspiracy theory.

[Linked Image]