Originally Posted by Owain
It's in applying that definition in an area in which it is inapplicable.


This is an empty assertion.

Have you paused to consider that there might be other qualifications other than constitutional qualifications?

What I said is entirely reasonable, within accepted use norms, and conforming to dictionary definition. You on other hand latched to a specific definition, and keep insisting that I must have meant that one thing.

Lets pause here to consider. Did you really think "No you must have meant X when you said Y, and X is wrong" type of illogical retort would work?

If yes:
Originally Posted by Owain
It's in applying that definition in an area in which it is inapplicable.


I did not fill any applications. You are making stuff up.



[Linked Image]