I am not sure why are you trying to turn this discussion into annual pedantic meeting of pedants.

When I spoke about candidate's qualifications and you retort about constitutional qualifiers, you are intentionally talking past my points.

Sure, constitutionally, he is qualified. Nobody spoke about this until you brought it up.

However, there is a very clear questions of competency. That you are trying to dodge by willfully misunderstanding what I said.

[Linked Image]