Originally Posted by Owain
It's not my legal principle, doofus. I'm just reporting it. Complain to the legal profession about the last several hundred years it's been in use.


Back to name calling I see. I am a doofus because I don't know much about a legal principle that has been rejected in many cases. At least I don't turn a blind eye to a pedophile and sexual predator.

"Although many common law jurisdictions have rejected a categorical application of the rule, the doctrine has survived in some American courts."
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Falsus_in_uno,_falsus_in_omnibus


Can we apply "Falsus in uno, falsus in omnibus" to Trump for lying about never meeting the women he supposedly sexually assaulted? Which by his own admission he has since hes been known to "grab them by the pussy" or walk in on them while they are getting dressed.

http://thehill.com/homenews/adminis...users-after-he-claimed-he-never-met-them