So Stubs, if you were to guess, what percentage do you think are tax-cheating, drug-dealing crackheads out of all social net recipients?

When you mention "get a bit more Darwinian and stop trying to save everyone", are you actually suggesting we let people die on the streets? Also, if we get more Darwinian, would you object if starving people committed crime to stay alive? If we speak in strictly-Darwinian terms do you think "I was starving to death" is justifiable defense for robbery? How would you reconcile that with the letter of law as it exists today? Last but not least, how much do you think it cost to the government to imprison someone and how does it compare to social spending in similar cases?

Please at least consider, if not reply, to these questions.

[Linked Image]