First, it wasn't immediately obvious to me that you understood exact meaning. I wasn't sure until fairly late into the debate if you are arguing that "FED = communism" or "FED = controls". Absurd refers to former and I am very familiar to constant abuse of this and similar terms by the right. I presented alternative politically neutral terminology and you rejected it calling it "beating around the bush". Question I keep asking myself, that if you clearly see that I object to "central planning" use and do not intend it to use it as a political slur, then why insist using it and standing on a point?

I am still not convinced that Ron Paul understands exact meaning, and that what my initial objection was based on. He is all "gold standard" utopian-libertarian. No concessions to practicality in any of his views.

[Linked Image]