Originally Posted By: Sini
Originally Posted By: Helemoto

How the fuck does this involve prisoner cost??


If it costs more to imprison than to prevent crime, then prevention is preferred. Now, by prevention I don't mean more policing but more social programs. You might view people on social assistance as lazy non-contributors, but if you force them to get going they turn to crime. So, perhaps letting them be is cheaper option?



You make a good progressive but you cant fool me. No matter
how many times you repeat yourself, I will not be against
social programs.
It seems about 70% of what you say and argue comes from false
assumptions, just like a good progressive.