Indeed. Indeed. I have felt that way for several pages of posts now.

Since the only way you can even try to make a point is to apply new interpretations to old postings.

See, if you were genuine and not just a random mental midget looking to score points on a straw man - your switch to formal interpretation would have been accompanied by

1) a restatement of precedent as understood for the context

2) a clarification of the actual topic, and mutual agreement that we were discussing the same thing

I was kind of hoping a light bulb would go off in your head, after your interpreted P/C were rejected multiple times for not being my actual assertion... but it seems it was a vain hope.

For who could be free when every other man's humour might domineer over him? - John Locke (2nd Treatise, sect 57)