Really?

Discretionary spending consist of large number of social outlays, like education and research grants, that not only directly benefit society, but also invest in the future of our nation. While technically correct, that by cutting discretionary spending there will be less taxes for everyone, including poor, cutting it in a way Ryan's plan proposes is not a good idea. Claiming it will be beneficial for the poor is disingenuous.

So is this the point where you and fellow conservatives go into complete denial mode due to absolute indefensibility of Ryan's positions? I linked all this material in vane hopes that maybe Derid and couple more people realize what exactly they are going to vote for and feel bad about it, it isn't like I expect anyone to actually change vote despite this being clear example of another crony conservative-in-name-only selling US public interest to the highest bidder.

Last edited by sinij; 08/15/12 11:28 AM.
[Linked Image]