Originally Posted by Brutal
I think the difference is that Sini's viewpoint advocates "Access to healthcare that is not proceeded by crippling debt" while the law prohibiting hospitals from turning away patients simply affords "Access to healthcare" which may or may not be followed by said crippling debt. Either of you please correct me if I'm wrong.

I don't want anyone stricken with crippling debt. I do want everyone to be able to have exceptional health care. I don't think anyone here would disagree with either of those statements. I think we disagree over how to provide the care without the debt.

[Linked Image from i30.photobucket.com]