Jet, using anything with U.N. as part of the name is not likely to convince anyone who is not tying to be convinced, TBH. Especially since that particular UN climate organization has been shown to be generally incompetent and scandal ridden.

Anyhow, as previously stated... CO2 is a weak greenhouse gas, scientists have always piled on "consensus" even when that consensus turns out to be wrong 5,10 or 20 years down the road. You should know that has happened to o many times to count, like I said - if the consensus is the same and better understood in 20 years, then it can be considered likely to be true. Until then, it is just one more scientific fad... one with an epic shit ton of money and propoganda piling on behind it.

For who could be free when every other man's humour might domineer over him? - John Locke (2nd Treatise, sect 57)