"you put one bullet into a revolver, spin it, point at someone and pull the trigger."

And everyone is ok with that . . . . as long as the gun wasn't a scary black military looking one :D

*sorry, I just had to*


Actually, consequences of the aforementioned actions aside, why should the morality of the entire thing rest upon the consequences of the action ? I would think any who think this way are missing the bigger picture.

The question isn't did someone die because of the action, rather, what the hell put the action in motion to begin with ?

Both outcomes are just as f*cked up considering neither party knows what the outcome will be until that particular moment in time passes. While one will be physically lethal, the other will be psychologically devastating as well. While one party knows the outcome is not certain, the other pretty much believes they're about to die.

From my perspective, regardless of the outcome, the act is morally f&cked.

Last edited by Daye; 01/13/13 03:16 PM.