Originally Posted By: sini
No, you didn't get it. Moral luck does not prove or disprove the idea that there is a right or wrong, only that there is unique correct right or wrong for any given moral judgment.
Oh no, I got it.
Originally Posted By: sini
Homosexuality reduces reproductive fitness.
So, perhaps you can see how to a person with the drive to propagate the species, someone who lacked that drive would be aberrant.

Originally Posted By: sini
Right and wrong are defined by measurable outcomes. Right produces net benefit and wrong produces net loss.
From a moral luck standpoint, how can you ever know if an action is right or wrong before it is committed?

[Linked Image from i30.photobucket.com]