Ok, "moral luck" is philosophical word games designed to discredit the idea that there is a right and wrong. Got it.

Originally Posted By: sini
Specific examples that irk me are sexuality and marriage laws. "You shall not lie with a man, as with a woman" is a basis for all discrimination against sexual minorities. Instead of channeling conversation into rational and more productive Darwinian fitness we have "god hate fags" hysteria.

As to Longshanks' point on morals and ethics - you can't interchange these terms. Ethics are subset of Morals, where Not Ethics portion contains all kinds of religious junk that has nothing to do with rational concepts of right and wrong.
Two questions:
1. How does homosexuality fit into a Darwinian world?
2. How do you "rationally" define right and wrong?


[Linked Image from i30.photobucket.com]