Quote:

It boils down to being proactive instead of reactionary, organization, structure, and progressive theory, combined with in game leadership, definable goals, the strategies associated with those goals, power projection concerning a phased deployment of guild objectives, and the overall recruitment of quality members willing to make the sacrifices necessary, or within their scope to strengthen the guild.

In a roundabout way, you just stated much of what I said in the latter half of my last post.

Quote:

While I agree with everything Crim blatantly plagiarized it will be more important for each and every member to do what's best for the guild instead of what's best for themselves.



1. The source I used in my quote on Followership was *blatantly* noted. It's only plagiarism if you don't list your sources and/or give proper credit.

2. Doing what's both right for yourself and guild will automatically happen with anyone who has developed decent followership, leadership, and support skills. We can discuss theories about what is right and wrong with past and future scenarios all day, but until the focus is upon the actual skills necessary to work cohesively, accomplish simple tasks that support the larger scope, and remain dedicated to *a* game; nothing will happen.

[Linked Image]

[Linked Image from nodiatis.com]