Just for the sake of argument, let's say that our democracy really is about to be destroyed by teenagers with airhorns. To solve the problem, I propose a new structure for universities to adopt when student organizations invite political pundits to speak on their campus:

- Deny the student org or the invited guest the ability to accept direct donations on behalf of any cause. Orgs found accepting donations related to guest appearances would be denied future guest visitation permits.
- Enforce an admission fee, price set by student body vote, may be selectively increased but not decreased by sponsoring organization
- Require 100% of proceeds above administrative costs to be allocated based on vote of the entire student body.


I think the teenagers with airhorns will accept this compromise because they know that the student body agrees with them, and the proceeds for an unimpeded event will directly benefit their interests.
I think the orgs inviting Milos and such will reject this, because they don't actually stand to benefit - their cause was never that of actual speech, but of promotion.

[Linked Image]