Originally Posted by rhaikh
Originally Posted by Sini
The cornerstone assertion of this paper is that racial priming theory is a thing.


So the cornerstone of your suspicion surrounding this work is the legitimacy of an academic study with 1300 citations?


That, and bad statistics, questionable methods, lack of finding correlations for key arguments... and most importantly, the paper doesn't state what fair.org claims it says. It doesn't support their argument in any substantial way.

[Linked Image]