The KGB Oracle Forums General Public Discussion (SPECIAL ACCESS) KGB Political Debate Central GOP internal civil war

He is educated, speaks Russian, and agrees with Putin when it comes to same sex marriage.

So what?

you forgot that he diddles little children.

He likes his girls too young. 16 is hardly a child.

To me, much more interesting to see how feminism stretched definitions to the point that people stopped paying attention. On the right, accusations of rape are now largely ignored. Mainstream is getting there.

Interestingly, Trump could probably rape a Chinese tourist in the middle of the day on the White House lawn and his support base would automatically assume it is left smear campaign.

So say the unsubstantiated allegations, unless you have access to proof.

Do you? Have access to proof? Other than the forged yearbook?

https://nypost.com/2017/12/08/roy-moore-accuser-admits-altering-yearbook-entry/

Moore himself never denied relationships with 16 year old girls. This is not illegal, as they are of age of consent. I never claimed there is any evidence of any kind violence or rape.

So you have to ask, is grown man having consensual relationships with teenagers a morally acceptable thing? Personally, I don't care, but the guy is running on a bible-thumping platform. So that makes him a hypocrite.

It is not unlike having ISIS leader getting filmed enjoying double cheeseburger with extra bacon and a beer. Not wrong to me, but against subject's declared values.

Moore seems to be denying the allegations here.

What are you looking at?

http://www.cnn.com/2017/11/11/politics/roy-moore-allegations/index.html

Ahh i see you are an avid Fox News reader. Did you know they had to take down the word "forgery" since it's not true and is considered libel?
http://thehill.com/homenews/media/3...-moore-accuser-yearbook-forgery-headline

But I guess in alternative facts world, you wouldn't even believe experts now, right?
http://www.wcvb.com/article/roy-moore-accuser-yearbook-entry-notes-handwriting/14390831

Handwriting experts had already identified the sevens in the date written in the yearbook as having been written by a hand different than Moore's.

Busted, she's now trying to say that although she forged that part of the entry, we should believe that the rest of it is valid.

There is a legal doctrine that covers matters like this.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Falsus_in_uno,_falsus_in_omnibus

Why then does her lawyer refuse to release the yearbook for independent handwriting analysis?

To ask the question is to answer it.