The KGB Oracle
Serving the online gaming community since 1997
Visit www.the-kgb.com
For additional information

Join KGB DISCORD: http://discord.gg/KGB

The KGB Oracle Forums General Public Discussion (SPECIAL ACCESS) KGB Political Debate Central Warmest temperatures in 4k yrs claim = bad science

KGB Information

Untitled 1

Visit KGB HQ
www.the-kgb.com

Popular Topics(Views)

2,638,314 An Armed Society, is a politer Society

2,535,645 Dirty Deeds Done With Sheep !

2,038,783 Trump card

1,343,038 Picture Thread

586,718 Corporate social irresponsibility

525,433 THE TRUTH about the ground zero "Mosque"

481,457 Romney

457,907 Shroud of the Avatar KGB City?

421,382 GOP internal civil war

397,167 Dog Fighting Module Access

Print Thread

Rate Thread

Re: Forbes on climate = bad journalism Sini #115179 03/20/13 06:34 PM
Joined: Nov 2005 Posts: 1,526 Likes: 1 Nebraska,Omaha Helemoto KGB Supreme Knight
Helemoto KGB Supreme Knight Joined: Nov 2005 Posts: 1,526 Likes: 1 Nebraska,Omaha	Originally Posted By: sini Originally Posted By: Helemoto Consensus is not scientific. Science is fact. You don't understand what science is. Thank you for showing us all how smart you are.

Entire Thread
Subject	Posted By	Posted
Warmest temperatures in 4k yrs claim = bad science	Derid	03/17/13 10:04 PM
Re: Warmest temperatures in 4k yrs claim = bad science	Sini	03/18/13 03:39 AM
Re: Warmest temperatures in 4k yrs claim = bad science	Helemoto	03/18/13 11:36 AM
Re: Warmest temperatures in 4k yrs claim = bad science	Arkh	03/18/13 11:52 PM
Re: Warmest temperatures in 4k yrs claim = bad science	Derid	03/18/13 04:17 AM
Re: Warmest temperatures in 4k yrs claim = bad science	Sini	03/18/13 04:24 AM
Re: Warmest temperatures in 4k yrs claim = bad science	Derid	03/18/13 04:34 AM
Re: Forbes on climate = bad journalism	Sini	03/18/13 03:42 PM
Re: Forbes on climate = bad journalism	Helemoto	03/18/13 09:07 PM
Re: Forbes on climate = bad journalism	Kaotic	03/18/13 09:17 PM
Re: Forbes on climate = bad journalism	Sini	03/20/13 03:13 PM
Re: Forbes on climate = bad journalism	Helemoto	03/20/13 09:07 PM
Re: Forbes on climate = bad journalism	Sini	03/21/13 12:18 AM
Re: Forbes on climate = bad journalism	Helemoto	03/21/13 01:34 AM
Re: Forbes on climate = bad journalism	Derid	03/18/13 04:42 PM
Re: Forbes on climate = bad journalism	Sini	03/18/13 07:09 PM
Re: Forbes on climate = bad journalism	Derid	03/20/13 08:00 PM
Re: Forbes on climate = bad journalism	Sini	03/21/13 12:22 AM
Re: Forbes on climate = bad journalism	Derid	03/21/13 06:58 AM
Re: Forbes on climate = bad journalism	Arkh	03/21/13 09:19 PM
Re: Forbes on climate = bad journalism	Sini	03/21/13 01:29 PM
Re: Forbes on climate = bad journalism	Derid	03/21/13 11:40 PM
Re: Forbes on climate = bad journalism	Kaotic	03/22/13 12:01 AM
Re: Forbes on climate = bad journalism	Sini	03/22/13 01:52 AM
Re: Forbes on climate = bad journalism	Kaotic	03/22/13 04:55 AM
Re: Forbes on climate = bad journalism	Derid	03/22/13 01:59 AM
Re: Forbes on climate = bad journalism	Wolfgang	03/22/13 08:40 PM
Re: Forbes on climate = bad journalism	Derid	04/03/13 09:24 PM

Moderated by Derid

Link Copied to Clipboard

The KGB Oracle Forums General Public Discussion (SPECIAL ACCESS) KGB Political Debate Central Warmest temperatures in 4k yrs claim = bad science

The Knights of Glory and Beer (C) 2021All Rights Reserved

The Knights of Glory and Beer (C) 2021
All Rights Reserved