The KGB Oracle
Serving the online gaming community since 1997
Visit www.the-kgb.com
For additional information

Join KGB DISCORD: http://discord.gg/KGB

The KGB Oracle Forums General Public Discussion (SPECIAL ACCESS) KGB Political Debate Central Warmest temperatures in 4k yrs claim = bad science

KGB Information

Untitled 1

Visit KGB HQ
www.the-kgb.com

Popular Topics(Views)

2,637,737 An Armed Society, is a politer Society

2,535,148 Dirty Deeds Done With Sheep !

2,037,936 Trump card

1,342,793 Picture Thread

586,240 Corporate social irresponsibility

525,191 THE TRUTH about the ground zero "Mosque"

481,335 Romney

457,620 Shroud of the Avatar KGB City?

421,185 GOP internal civil war

396,822 Dog Fighting Module Access

Print Thread

Rate Thread

Re: Forbes on climate = bad journalism Helemoto #115173 03/20/13 05:18 PM
Joined: Jan 2006 Posts: 5,528 Likes: 10 Sini KGB Supreme Court Justice KGB Paladin King's High Council
Sini KGB Supreme Court Justice KGB Paladin King's High Council Joined: Jan 2006 Posts: 5,528 Likes: 10	Originally Posted By: Helemoto Consensus is not scientific. Science is fact. You don't understand what science is.

Entire Thread
Subject	Posted By	Posted
Warmest temperatures in 4k yrs claim = bad science	Derid	03/17/13 10:04 PM
Re: Warmest temperatures in 4k yrs claim = bad science	Sini	03/18/13 03:39 AM
Re: Warmest temperatures in 4k yrs claim = bad science	Helemoto	03/18/13 11:36 AM
Re: Warmest temperatures in 4k yrs claim = bad science	Arkh	03/18/13 11:52 PM
Re: Warmest temperatures in 4k yrs claim = bad science	Derid	03/18/13 04:17 AM
Re: Warmest temperatures in 4k yrs claim = bad science	Sini	03/18/13 04:24 AM
Re: Warmest temperatures in 4k yrs claim = bad science	Derid	03/18/13 04:34 AM
Re: Forbes on climate = bad journalism	Sini	03/18/13 03:42 PM
Re: Forbes on climate = bad journalism	Helemoto	03/18/13 09:07 PM
Re: Forbes on climate = bad journalism	Kaotic	03/18/13 09:17 PM
Re: Forbes on climate = bad journalism	Sini	03/20/13 03:13 PM
Re: Forbes on climate = bad journalism	Helemoto	03/20/13 09:07 PM
Re: Forbes on climate = bad journalism	Sini	03/21/13 12:18 AM
Re: Forbes on climate = bad journalism	Helemoto	03/21/13 01:34 AM
Re: Forbes on climate = bad journalism	Derid	03/18/13 04:42 PM
Re: Forbes on climate = bad journalism	Sini	03/18/13 07:09 PM
Re: Forbes on climate = bad journalism	Derid	03/20/13 08:00 PM
Re: Forbes on climate = bad journalism	Sini	03/21/13 12:22 AM
Re: Forbes on climate = bad journalism	Derid	03/21/13 06:58 AM
Re: Forbes on climate = bad journalism	Arkh	03/21/13 09:19 PM
Re: Forbes on climate = bad journalism	Sini	03/21/13 01:29 PM
Re: Forbes on climate = bad journalism	Derid	03/21/13 11:40 PM
Re: Forbes on climate = bad journalism	Kaotic	03/22/13 12:01 AM
Re: Forbes on climate = bad journalism	Sini	03/22/13 01:52 AM
Re: Forbes on climate = bad journalism	Kaotic	03/22/13 04:55 AM
Re: Forbes on climate = bad journalism	Derid	03/22/13 01:59 AM
Re: Forbes on climate = bad journalism	Wolfgang	03/22/13 08:40 PM
Re: Forbes on climate = bad journalism	Derid	04/03/13 09:24 PM

Moderated by Derid

Link Copied to Clipboard

The KGB Oracle Forums General Public Discussion (SPECIAL ACCESS) KGB Political Debate Central Warmest temperatures in 4k yrs claim = bad science

The Knights of Glory and Beer (C) 2021All Rights Reserved

The Knights of Glory and Beer (C) 2021
All Rights Reserved