Ron Paul is a human, like any other. I havent passed any judgement on the case yet, too often a facile case is made by a person's detractors and tossed out for the peanut gallery.

Lots of people think Social Security shouldn't have been implemented for example, yet since they are forced to play under that system rightfully collect what they are entitled to.

If Paul has a case (which I am not certain of, not having take the time to actually look in depth) and the only means of redress happens to be an international body, then I could hardly fault him for going that route. Doing so , and having to do so could in fact strengthen not invalidate his insistence that the current international regulatory paradigm was a bad idea to begin with.

For who could be free when every other man's humour might domineer over him? - John Locke (2nd Treatise, sect 57)