The KGB Oracle Forums General Public Discussion (SPECIAL ACCESS) KGB Political Debate Central GOP internal civil war

Citation needed



Citation needed.
Annotation =/= forgery

Citations provided.

http://www.dailywire.com/news/23639/watch-moores-lawyer-calls-yearbook-be-examined-ryan-saavedra

Only after pointing this out does she admit to having made the entry herself.

https://nypost.com/2017/12/08/roy-moore-accuser-admits-altering-yearbook-entry/

Falsus in unus, falsus in omnibus.

Falsus in uno, falsus in omnibus, what a way to live your life. I think I am starting to finally understand the way you think though.

I like Latin as well, my favorite Latin term is "Fiat justitia ruat cælum" and I have a feeling last night was an example of whats to come for republicans that have sworn fealty to this president. Still, it's kind of sad that almost 50% of Alabamians(?) think electing a pedo to the senate is perfectly ok.

ftfy

It's not my legal principle, doofus. I'm just reporting it. Complain to the legal profession about the last several hundred years it's been in use.

Back to name calling I see. I am a doofus because I don't know much about a legal principle that has been rejected in many cases. At least I don't turn a blind eye to a pedophile and sexual predator.

"Although many common law jurisdictions have rejected a categorical application of the rule, the doctrine has survived in some American courts."
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Falsus_in_uno,_falsus_in_omnibus


Can we apply "Falsus in uno, falsus in omnibus" to Trump for lying about never meeting the women he supposedly sexually assaulted? Which by his own admission he has since hes been known to "grab them by the pussy" or walk in on them while they are getting dressed.

http://thehill.com/homenews/adminis...users-after-he-claimed-he-never-met-them

If you don't want to be called a doofus, stop acting like a doofus.

There is still no evidence that Moore is either a pedophile or a sexual preditor, unless you are sitting on some no one else is aware of.

By his own admission, Trump took part in consensual behavior with women. Nothing wrong with that.

But really, Goriam, stop being such a bloody hypocrite.

You didn't mean this remark about the way I think to be complimentary, but it is what earned you the name of doofus for blaming me for the existence of a legal principle that very much applies in this case.

Of course the maxim should not be applied categorically in face of supporting evidence, but there is no supporting evidence in this case. So, since the accuser has been shown false in one, her credibility is justifiably tainted, and anything she says should be disregarded in the absence of supporting evidence.

If you are objective, there is a lot of evidence of dubious behavior and if you subscribe to Christian morals, a lot of evidence of amoral behavior. However, applying "more likely than not" standard of proof - there isn't enough to conclude Moore is a sexual predator.

Separately, if you believe in rule of law, there is lots of lawlessness. He disregarded court ruling on multiple occasions. That alone disqualifies him for being a senator.

Thankfully, he lost so we can leave it at that.

Evidence based on agitprop from political rivals?

Unconvincing.