lol

I take his word on it though, primarily because the views contained do not fit in the slightest his general principles which he espouses and acts on.

If his behavior, voting record, personal writing over the past several decades that "is" attributable to him were not what they were, I might be more inclined to believe it.

But, as he says - racism is a collectivist idea.

I honestly think he just goofed, and honestly didnt pay attention. Alot of people who have media staff working on their behalf, or who own media companies do not read every word of every issue - far from it. It just so happens that he had a goofball put a couple issues of his own out.

But people believe often what they want to believe, and many people seem to want to believe he was condoning racism, as opposed to having a goofball put out a couple bad newsletters before it was caught, and he was fired.

Whole thing reminds me of when he was accused by many (faux news, and by extension some people on this forum) of saying
sept 11 was the work of the government.

In reality, aside from the BS propogated by the Looter elements of the GOP establishment he voted in favor of going to afghanistan to punish Al Quada and " the persons responsible for sept 11" , though he did also suggest using more Constitutional wording, he still voted in favor.

The only foreign military adventure he has ever voted in favor of, mind you.

The one thing you will NOT see, is someone discussing the issues or discussing workability of various policy, instead its just lame attempts at personal slander.

Which stands to reason, most of the candidates dont have the first clue about real policy or governing, they just sell what their pollsters tell them to sell.