Originally Posted By: Tas's ridiculous NYT article
The idea that big banks damage the broader economy has considerable resonance on the intellectual right. Thomas Hoenig, the recently retired president of the Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City, has been our clearest official voice on this topic. And Eugene Fama, father of the efficient markets view of finance, said on CNBC last year that having banks that are "too big to fail" is "perverting activities and incentives" in financial markets - giving big financial firms "a license to increase risk; where the taxpayers will bear the downside and firms will bear the upside."

The mainstream political right, however, has been reluctant to take on the issue. This changed on Wednesday, with a very clear statement by Jon Huntsman in The Wall Street Journal on regulatory capture and its consequences. Before the 2008 financial crisis, he wrote, "the largest banks were pushing hard to take more risk at taxpayers' expense."


I don't know what kind of ridiculous propaganda site you use for your news but this is what the tea party people have been SCREAMING from the get go. They didn't like it when Bush (Mr. "we have to suspend the free market system to save it") did this "too big to fail" bullshit and they didn't like it when Barry did it two more times, or that his new "jobs" bill is just more of the same.

For fucks sake man, get over yourself and realize that we're not the problem.


[Linked Image from i30.photobucket.com]