Let me be Clear - 09/23/14 04:10 AM
Re: Let me be Clear - 09/23/14 08:55 PM
Obama is another Bill Clinton. When Bill would get some bad press or bad poll numbers he would bomb someone. Looks like Junior has picked up the torch.
Also seems like they are bombing them a little late in the game. He's my stance on giving out weapons to groups that "WE THINK" we are helping. When it comes to the middle east we should NEVER hand out anymore weapons. Seriously fuck them, if they or anyone else want us to get involved then we need to be clear that once we go in it's all balls... nothing will be left standing and we will fuck shit up. Otherwise we need to keep our ass's at home and throw some military units on the border. Yeah FUCK Mexico too.
Also seems like they are bombing them a little late in the game. He's my stance on giving out weapons to groups that "WE THINK" we are helping. When it comes to the middle east we should NEVER hand out anymore weapons. Seriously fuck them, if they or anyone else want us to get involved then we need to be clear that once we go in it's all balls... nothing will be left standing and we will fuck shit up. Otherwise we need to keep our ass's at home and throw some military units on the border. Yeah FUCK Mexico too.
Re: Let me be Clear - 09/24/14 03:36 AM
It isn't US place to police this mess, even if we admittedly did not had enough collective wisdom to stay out last time, and as a result had a hand in getting it to this point.
Also what is the alternative? Do you believe that Romney would have not acted in similar way? I think Romney would have put boots on the ground. So would Hillary.
Rand Paul?
From http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2014/09/23/House-GOP-leaders-back-oBama-ISIS-attacks
Also what is the alternative? Do you believe that Romney would have not acted in similar way? I think Romney would have put boots on the ground. So would Hillary.
Rand Paul?
Quote:
Sen. Rand Paul (R-KY), who hasn’t said anything on Monday evening or early Tuesday yet, has said in recent weeks that he supports airstrikes but if he were president he would have sought congressional approval before engaging in such military action on behalf of the United States.
"If I were in President Obama’s shoes at this time, I would have called Congress back, I would have had a joint session of Congress, and I would have said ‘this is why ISIS is a threat to the United States, to the stability of the region, to our embassy, to our diplomats, and this is why I’m asking you today to authorize air attacks,’” Paul said in an interview with Breitbart News right before August recess ended, for instance.
"If I were in President Obama’s shoes at this time, I would have called Congress back, I would have had a joint session of Congress, and I would have said ‘this is why ISIS is a threat to the United States, to the stability of the region, to our embassy, to our diplomats, and this is why I’m asking you today to authorize air attacks,’” Paul said in an interview with Breitbart News right before August recess ended, for instance.
From http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2014/09/23/House-GOP-leaders-back-oBama-ISIS-attacks
Re: Let me be Clear - 09/24/14 07:15 AM
Yeah Rand Paul has taken the line of thinking that the US basically created this monster and needs to take part in keeping it from toppling Damascus and Baghdad. Taking part doesnt mean US troops, it means stop arming them, providing support to Iraqis and Kurds and bringing Qatari, Sauds in line.
Re: Let me be Clear - 09/27/14 05:25 PM
Interference is just going to create next set of monsters.
Fundamentally, it isn't our problem that Arab civilization is all but collapsed.
Fundamentally, it isn't our problem that Arab civilization is all but collapsed.